Disclaimer: This blog also contains a film review or a post-mortem styled in a pure fashion that I follow, if you are into that kind of thing.
TRIGGER WARNING: Subtle mention of domestic violence, violence against women, harassment.
Trigger Warning Returns: Mention of ‘feminism’, ‘justified arguments’ and r*****al thinking.
Before we get started on this ‘monstrous’ topic, on a totally unrelated side note can we take a moment to talk about the difference this dude is making?
In the midst of televangelists spitting onscreen to solve an ongoing, critical viral outbreak the century has seen to prove that the virus has been ‘destroyed’ to leaders denying responisibility at various positions, with some even making speeches that would require the study of ancient Indian texts, media has gotten extremely confusing, John Oliver( picture above), a stand-up comedian, host of Last Week Tonight, is my source of entertainment, laughs and truly disturbing horrendous facts. Even though, he denies the tag of an ‘investigative journalist’, he feels a lot more closer to the definition rather than mainstream media which surprisingly sucks in an all-encompassing, global manner.
John Oliver is one of my role models now and I just look upto him for delivering my daily quota of ‘getting through life without punching a wall’ juice.
Apart from the glaring pandemic, stoppage of life as we know it and a pretty hectic life ahead from now on, I thought it was time for us to do a little rebranding and actually reconsider the topics that we talk about. So, right on schedule( are we?!), we are going to have a look at one of my favourite topics of interest.
Domestic Violence.
Yikes, yep this is where this conversation is headed. You have stayed long enough for me to earn a view so unless you feel domestic violence is an issue that should be addressed in the right way, you can leave and maybe check out my post on Shammi, a toxic mentally unstable man from Kumbalangi Nights.
Okay, let’s dive in.
According to the global database maintained by the forking United Nations, India has a 288% of physical and sexual violence committed by intimate partners in the age group of 15-49 throughout their lifetime.
There are a lot of problems with that one sentence.
The percentage increase, the age group involved includes WOMEN WHO HAVE BEEN MARRIED UNDERAGE and the data is around FOUR YEARS OLD.
You can obviously guess the difference this particular film alone must have actively contributed towards changing numbers.
Incoming fans in 3, 2, 1 !
So I went on a hunt to uncover more data and found the following:
- There are no official data statistics that are available for the sexual violence committed against women by a non-intimate partner. NO DATA.
- Â Child marriage stands at 273%, let’s just keep this aside for a different episode.
- India stands at Gender Inequality Index Rank at 125. At this point, I feel bad for UN because NOBODY CAN TRACK THIS NONSENSE because THE DATA IS JUST HUGE.
So, I began to take a look at the laws regarding this VERY ACTIVE PROBLEM. One, it has always been a problem, obviously just like gender based wage gap discrimination and other obvious, hard to ignore bullshit surrounding gender-based violence ( glares at ‘Bois Locker Room’) and additionally important, because IT HAS INCREASED DURING THE LOCKDOWN 1, 2, 3 AND 4. And who knows, the problem might get potentially worse during the well. the fifth one.
What, you thought we are done? These sequels are somewhat like the, Hangover series. At first, it was challenging and exciting and by the final one, we are just going with the flow and not really blown away by THE CONFUSING TWIST OF EVENTS. We would just say an ‘okay’ and get back to screaming over the screen and still hear that one annoying co-worker go,” I can’t hear you, can you repeat the instructions?”
My house is a working from home nightmare. It feels like a call centre at this point with the laughs, howls, and screams.
So, back to the law.(Greenback Boogie plays)
The National Commission for Women began a WhatsApp hotline to report domestic violence and in the first week of Lockdown, it saw a 53% rise in cases.
Additionally, the following was found:
“There are several laws protecting a married woman from abuse from her husband or her husbandâs relatives. Under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, harassment for dowry by the husband or his family is considered a crime. This harassment can be either mental or physical. Even though marital rape is not recognized as a crime in India, forced sex with oneâs wife can be considered cruelty under this section. Section 498 A has a wide scope. It also covers any and all wilful conducts against a woman which drive the woman to commit suicide or grave injury or risk to life, limb or overall health. Again, health includes the mental and physical health of the woman.
The practice of dowry itself is outlawed under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Despite this, if dowry has been given to and taken by anyone other than the woman, she is entitled to that money/property as the case may be under this Act.
Furthermore, the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act 2005 prohibits a wide range of abuse against women â physical, emotional, sexual and economical and all these are extensively defined under the Act. The scope of the Act covers women who are in a live-in relationship and are not married. A woman has the choice to be free from violence and has various options under this Act. She has a right to get an order of protection against her husband and his family, to continue living in the same house i.e. she cannot be thrown out of her matrimonial home even if she reports her abusers, to claim maintenance, to have custody to her children and to claim compensation. Under the DV Act and also under section 125 of the Indian Penal Code, a woman does not have to necessarily file for a divorce to have a right to receive maintenance from her husband. The nature of a married relationship is such that it makes it incumbent on the man to provide maintenance for his wife (in some cases if she is unable to provide for herself and in some cases even otherwise). A petition for maintenance is maintainable even in the absence of one for divorce.”
SOURCE:Ivde Click Cheyy
The problem? The practical enforcement of the law and the obvious painful journey the woman in question is subjected to. A noted cultural anthropologist, Sreeparna Chattopadhyay, who has closely studied the issue concluded that the very terms used in the legal discourse trivilises the act of the accused perpetrator through victim-blaming, using terms avoiding the heinous nature of the act itself as a whole and strategies that fail to highlight the responsibility of the perp.
It is not surprising to see that we handle domestic violence and other relevant issues just like how this bandana wearing coolest guy I have ever come across does it:
AVOID YAAA.
A Bollywood film titled ‘Thappad’Â was released this year in February. Currently streaming on Amazon Prime( not an ad hehe), ‘Thappad’Â is an excellent watch for many reasons. Most importantly, one reason.
- IT’S AWESOME GO WATCH IT PLZ
That too, and also it addressed very ‘real’ issues and it is not an easy watch. It feels personal. It feels too close to heart. Partly, the reason for such conflicted feelings of agony and satisfaction could be due to the very nature the act can take form in or maybe, speaking as a woman, we all saw the slap incoming. We felt the exact moment at which he would do it, even before he actually committed it and it made us question:
Why does it feel familiar and so normal? We knew it is wrong, do not get me wrong, but it did take time for us to actually digest it. Digest the fact that in hindsight, we may have been blind as a bat.
The film addresses a number of issues related to feminism movement in India, but the bad word is not spoken out loud just like the hurt, fragile ego of some when they post ‘NOT ALL MEN’ as a response to literally anything. Some things are subtle, loud enough to be observed.
Let us do a breakdown of the film and go over some scenes that really stuck with the audience who appreciated the film, some even calling the film a ‘response’ to the film mentioned earlier. Not ‘Main Hoon Na’, the other one. I am not sure if it is a response to just that one film or a SLAP in the face to wake us up from this patriarchal, archaic, ignorant system that saw many, many films disregard women. I wish we could expand this conversion to regard people who do not identify with ‘men’ or ‘women’ and prefer to stay in the shadows as per their choice and decision. Unfortunately, in between this long overdue conversation regarding men and women, it is painful to see an entire section of people not being talked about. To be honest, I do not know how to introduce them when some even question why women still fight for things like they got everything no?
You have job, car, fair husband and little bit empowerment. What more do you want?
This demands a conversation about intersectional feminism, which would be another line of investigation and commentary which would be followed up with in a later post.
Getting back to the film to really get in there with the pacifics.
Pacifics.
No.
Specifics.
This is the part where you leave if you haven’t watched the film. Also, I will try my best to retain some of the suspense and not go over through every tiny detail because some things are left to be shown on screen.
The film begins with the stories of five women and a look into their personal lives. There is Sandhya ji, the lead protagonist’s mother, Sunita’s relationship with her husband, Adv.Netra who is out with her special friend, instead of her husband, to spend some fun time, Shivani who is a widow is out with her teenage daughter and finally, we are introduced to the character played by Taapsee Pannu, Amrita. The film begins with each one of these characters except, Sandhya and Amrita, on the road.
The above features Sunita and her husband having just another, totally normal fight about how much he hits her for the silliest things. The take away is that this happens frequently throughout the film to an extent, where even Amrita who is aware does not seek out to actively do something about it. It is normalised and has been treated as such. It is realistic and raw.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Next we move on to the tiny, cozy life of Amrita and Vikram. In the above slides, Amrita is portrayed as the almost too perfect wife who is literally at the wish and command of her husband. I am not being patronising, I love the way she treated him. Knowing him almost too well that she could easily guess what he would need and when.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Amrita who runs her home is good at what she does. She is not mistreated at all, nor can we observe any hints of prejudice or hatred towards her. She has a happy home. We also learn that Vikram is trying to impress his boss and get posted in London and the couple has been hoping that it would happen soon.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
This scene is an excellent example of the dismissive tone with which Vikram talked about his obviously deserving Shivani, who lives next door. It is an insight to two things:
- Such comments are rooted in misogyny and it indicates that one is almost too uncomfortable with women being achievers that one has to think there has to be something just not right with the way it is earned.
- It is a sign that this person’s internalised misogyny may be a hint of their fragile ego, conditioned idealogies etc. Even as a ‘joke’, such statement should be avoided because firstly, it is not funny , secondly, it is not funny and lastly, you will never be funny if you have to depend on casual sexist jokes and drives home the point that your delusion that you could be funny was ‘well received’.
Finally, Vikram gets the call that he got the offer to move to London and he throw a party. Everyone is happy and they start celebrating and dancing. In the middle of the party, Vikram gets a call saying he has been passed over and has been rejected the position and instead is offered a higher position but to be continued in India. He picks a fight with his superior who he feels double crossed him and Amrita, his loving wife, tries to pull him away from the brawl to avoid making a scene and despite his warnings, she kept trying because that’s what wives do and he took her anger of being rejected and being double crossed at her by slapping her. You won’t believe it.Â
He took out his anger on her by slapping her.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Amrita who was obviously physically and mentally hurt and embarassed goes into a shock-like state and these are the reactions of those around her. Her parents and Swati is extremely hurt. Shivani and her daughter too empathises with her and even Sunita knows that it is bad but Karan, Amrita’s brother and Swati’s boyfriend and Vikram’s mother and Amrita’s mother-in-law did not just get the point. Amrita did not have that much of a reason to be angry, right? Unreasonable reaction to a small, petty offense? I mean, Vikram was really angry, Rightfully so. I would break my fist if I had been passed over for a promotion I worked my ass of for. But would I hit people who love and care about me? Would I hit someone I respected and admired? Would I hit like anyone? Who gives me the right to hit my partner, then? You did not see Vikram breaking his mom’s nose or even his boss’ who stood right in front of him. He did not take it out on his friend and associate ( I forgot his name). So why Amrita?
Because he thought he had that right.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Amrita is hurt at her mother-in-law still being concerned about her role as a wife and does not question or even admonish her son’s actions. Finally, after a lot of nonsense and amazing dialogues and a complete lack of apology, she leaves for her parents’ home.
The cinematography is just outstanding. Vikram tries to reason with her by saying everything to justify what he did and not apologise and we can actually see that it took a lot on Amrita to just decide if he was good for her and to question her self-worth. The scene that composes Amrita and Sunita in different backgrounds but more or less faces the same troubles is heart-wrenching. One may not be as financially privileged to even consider a legal separation. Sunita, unlike Amrita, has the toll of financial burden and lack of other resources. Two women, quite different but in the same shoes.
Amrita leaves the house and a whole hassle continues which leads to a nasty legal battle. Amrita’s case is taken by Adv.Netra, who is a brilliant at her job and would be even better if only her husband did not say stuff to demean, demotivate and trivilise the work she does. Vikram visits her to make her understand, even tells her to hit him but she doesn’t because unlike him, she was sane. Also, everybody say,”Thank you, Viku for marrying her despite the fact that she does not know how to cook. Arey waah. What an example you set by bringing it up as an excuse to defend your actions!”
Vikram and his legal counsel resorts to different morally questionable tactics and Amrita refuses to play using the ‘Domestic Violence’ card despite the insistence of her legal counsel.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Finally, we learn Amrita is pregnant and it makes matters even worse. On a parallel track, Amrita’s father learns that Sandhya ji, his wife and her mother gave up her wishes to sing because as a married woman she was taught to prioritise her home over her desires without question. Amrita’s father feels sad for her and for himself for not even noticing the sacrifices she made because it was expected of her as a ‘good’ wife and a even better ‘mother’. Shivani is approached by Vikram to lie about what happened at the party so Amrita cannot pursue him for ‘Domestic Violence’.
I had to let go of some brilliant scenes because it is getting long and I wanted to leave some behind just for your own personal reflection. For example: The conversation between Sandhya ji and Amrita’s father, Sunita hitting her husband towards the end (not justified obviously but highlights the desperation of a woman who has had enough), the conversation between Shivani and her daughter, Netra and her husband, whom she finally leaves and even Vikram’s parents who get back together.
Amrita goes to Vikram’s place for the puja and we can see almost the entire cast coming together for this heartwarming scene.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Finally, they separate and Vikram apologises to her for his actions.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Some aspects of the film that I liked are listed as follows:
- The film had a lot of threads showing different shades and hues of internalised misogyny, disrespect, casual sexism, domestic violence explored through different narratives.
- Not every man failed to see what was wrong. Netra’s friend respected her work and admired her more than her own husband. Sandhya ji’s husband tried to get to know his wife and her woes even better. Shivani was perfectly happy with her daughter and did not need to get remarried just because she couldn’t handle being a single mother. Even Karan (Amrita’s brother) apologised to Swati for chiding her. Vikram’s boss explained his shitty behaviour to him.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
3.Vikram’s growth as a person should be a standard for behaviour. He accepted his wrongdoing and apologised for it.
4.Even the women in the film thought Amrita’s reaction to the slap was unreasonable. Apart from Swati, even Netra her own legal counsel questioned it for a while. Realisation did hit them, ultimately.
5. Some things are broken and no matter the extent of apology, it cannot be put together.
The cinematography and screenplay of the film was what struck me the most. The deliberate placement of the characters onscreen, the use of blue shades and hues (Vikram’s favourite colour, not Amrita’s). The dialogues that are simple yet complex drives a lot of points and jibes at our own conscience.
I truly hope more such films grace the screens and not just because of the issues they address, but also due to its brilliance as a film. The film is not a typical Bollywood entertainer and is definitely not recommended if you are looking for something to laugh at for two full hours. If you are someone who strongly feel cinema as an excellent mode of communicating repressed thoughts and ideas about our society and its propagation of certain ideas, this one might be your favourite.
Please feel free to submit your own feedback and views on the film through my social media handles or even comment right here!
P.S.- Honestly, if you read all that, you are amazing and I thank you wholeheartedly.